-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 229
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Enable use with memory-fs #83
Comments
Does that module actually implement enough of the features to work here? I didn't look at it immediately but I remember at least one previous issue about this. Of course, please feel so inclined to make a PR in which you think the ideal implementation should be. This module does not require(fs) anywhere, so the change here is not obvious to me. |
Line 96 in f75f969
Bummer. This would require modification of I see that Supporting this feature would require This is too low of a priority for me to champion such change. I will rather simply write to the disk and continue using Lets leave this open and see if more people require this feature. I am sensing it might be an edge use case. |
I have the same issue. Is there any way to provide fs module? |
Highly related #pillarjs/send/issues/160 |
I am producing all the files and storing them only in memory, i.e. https://github.com/webpack/memory-fs. I'd like there to be an option to tell
serve-static
which fs to use.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: