You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
I am trying to load-balance my traces from pod to otel-collectors, for this I want to be able to use the grpc-proxyless setup with grpc-xds, but I am getting an error where the xds name resolver is not considered a valid protocol.
Describe the solution you'd like xds should be considered a valid endpoint protocol so that we can use grpc-proxyless to load-balance traffic to otel-collector
Describe alternatives you've considered
I have tried shifting to http, but grpc-proxyless setup is more resilient as it provides more robust functionalities like circuitbreakers and dynamic endpoint updations.
Additional context
Currently since we are using the grpc protocol, we are connecting to only one of the pods of otel-collector, we want to be able to make our infra more resileient and load-balanceable for which we would need this setup. I believe there not much should be required from otel side except for just supporting the protocol, rest I believe if the grpc-xds library is present in the classpath, we should be good to go.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I'm not familiar with grpc-xds. Maybe you could sketch out what you have in mind in a draft PR? I should note that our OTLP grpc based exporters don't use the grpc-java library. We recreate the protocol ourselves to reduce dependencies and increase serialization efficiency. If grpc-xds is a plugin for grpc-java, it likely won't be simple integration.
So there will be a control plane which will receive events to kubernetes and it will get translated to dynamic discovery like when a server pod is added / deleted and GRPC since have this information can now do client side load-balancing at its end. As of now since grpc uses http2 connection, a lot of application pods can get connected to one opentelemetry collector server.
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
I am trying to load-balance my traces from pod to otel-collectors, for this I want to be able to use the grpc-proxyless setup with grpc-xds, but I am getting an error where the xds name resolver is not considered a valid protocol.
Describe the solution you'd like
xds
should be considered a valid endpoint protocol so that we can use grpc-proxyless to load-balance traffic to otel-collectorDescribe alternatives you've considered
I have tried shifting to http, but grpc-proxyless setup is more resilient as it provides more robust functionalities like circuitbreakers and dynamic endpoint updations.
Additional context
Currently since we are using the grpc protocol, we are connecting to only one of the pods of otel-collector, we want to be able to make our infra more resileient and load-balanceable for which we would need this setup. I believe there not much should be required from otel side except for just supporting the protocol, rest I believe if the grpc-xds library is present in the classpath, we should be good to go.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: