-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 581
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Are PRs that add typing to the code appreciated? #1017
Comments
If done incrementally (in small chunks) and in a way that doesn't make the code significantly worse (locally or in aggregate) yes! @sirosen has some plans there too which may be worth coordinating. And appreciate both the offer and you asking! |
If I can get any free time, I'll be happy to work on adding types on this library. Just wanted to know if there was any rules we should follow? (e.g. are we going for |
I'll chime in to say that I have not had the kind of free time in the past ~6 months that I expected to have to work on type annotations for Here's my current take (about which I would also like @Julian's feedback):
|
Yes sure and I think #1019 (comment) has to be taken into account, hence I think I'll go for the most straightforward ones first.
This is possible locally, I did it once but it is pretty heavy to run iirc |
Hi there! Definitely agree on my side on the straightforward ones being easiest to get in, so those are definitely welcome! I have to teach myself what |
Basically the issue title: are such PRs welcomed? The
stubs
intypeshed
are outdated and instead of updating them there I thought I could also invest some time in the project itself so they are more readily available for everybody.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: