-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 62
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
WIP: Enable test suite of libarrow
#1058
Draft
h-vetinari
wants to merge
9
commits into
conda-forge:main
Choose a base branch
from
h-vetinari:test_lib
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Draft
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service. I just wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR ( |
Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service. I just wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR ( |
except those depending on timing, following upstream, see https://github.com/apache/arrow/blob/apache-arrow-12.0.0/ci/appveyor-cpp-build.bat#L63-L68
also requires git submodule for parquet test data
kou
added a commit
to apache/arrow
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 15, 2024
) ### Rationale for this change Enable tests for libarrow in conda-forge: #35587 ### What changes are included in this PR? old glibc does not actually support timezones like `-0117` (used in `StrptimeZoneOffset` test). The exact lower bound for glibc is hard for me to determine; I know that it passes with 2.28 and that it fails with 2.17. Anything in between is an open question. I went with the conservative option here. ### Are these changes tested? Tested in conda-forge/arrow-cpp-feedstock#1058 ### Are there any user-facing changes? * GitHub Issue: #43808 Lead-authored-by: H. Vetinari <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Sutou Kouhei <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Sutou Kouhei <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Since #875, we're now running with the test suite for
pyarrow
. While working on #1048, I wanted to ensure that also the library portion works as intended, so thought about switching on the test suite forlibarrow
.After some initial attempts it looks like this is failing, hence will need some iteration together with upstream.