-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 368
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Bump node engine to 14 #1257
Bump node engine to 14 #1257
Conversation
Looks like appveyor’s matrix might need an update too |
Line 3 in 9337fac
|
Looks like we ran into chicken-egg problem. I wanted to bump node to 14 to be able to finish commander.js update, but updating
I propose we move on here without |
I've posted |
Who will do the merge now? I see one approval, but it was set before further commits. and @fbartho you didn't remove your approval after further comments. |
What is the process here? seems it's not moving ahead naturally (stalled for 4 days) and it's not described in contributing.md either other than push access is given out easily |
PR looks good to me, and there's no CLA on people's spare time on OSS maintenance |
nevertheless no answer on merge policies. since I have the mana to merge, should I have merged myself (or who?)? would like to hear some guides or something. |
Then no, please do not merge yourself, I + @fbartho generally merge most things - the ability to self merge is a system designed to allow for folks to worry less about their dependencies and handle absent maintainers (or folks looking to own sections of the codebase after some time) |
this was not the best decision to bump node dependency to v14. Distributed I bumped danger on CI which tested a package on different node versions (still would like to keep that package compatible with nodejs <14) but I'd need to either get rid of danger on nodejs v12 (even if it actually reports back on newer v14+ nodejs versions, it is still in package.json trying to be installed and CI fails) |
You probably don't need to run danger for all node versions. you are most likely checking the static code committed to repo, so it doesn't matter what node version was used to run danger.js. But staying on low versions is not a good option either. the dependencies can't be updated and the dependencies will be reported full of security vulnerabilities. Maintaining multiple version series probably won't going to work either due lack of manpower. my 2ç |
@falkenhawk you're welcome to stay behind on an older version of DangerJS, the older versions are the ones that are still compatible with Node12. NodeJS itself no longer supports Node12, and new features for DangerJS can't maintain a wider support range than that, it's just not practical. https://github.com/nodejs/release#release-schedule What's your real concern here @falkenhawk? You're trying to upgrade to latest DangerJS, but not upgrade to latest NodeJS? It's common when somebody is testing a special edge case, to use a pattern like patch-package to disable the node engine check on this package. We obviously can't provide support if you're patching things like that, but if you think your use-case would still be fine, you're welcome to remove that Engine check in your code-bases. |
This reflects what is running on CI. and also some of the current dependences already require that version.
Using
14.13.1
forlint-staged ^12
:See:
See #1252 (comment)