Introduce pnpm lockfile v9 detector

[FernandoRojo]

There is still no official docs for the new v9 lock if format, so this parsing logic is empirically based and will be updated as specs are released
Issue tracking v9 specs: pnpm/spec#6
Format should eventually get updated here: https://github.com/pnpm/spec/blob/master/lockfile

Includes a small refactoring to re-use code and establish consistency between lockfile parsing.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 95.75597% with 16 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 89.1%. Comparing base (179e5c0) to head (422e372).

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
...rs/pnpm/ParsingUtilities/PnpmV5ParsingUtilities.cs	82.7%	3 Missing and 2 partials ⚠️
...rs/pnpm/ParsingUtilities/PnpmV6ParsingUtilities.cs	72.7%	2 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
...ComponentDetection.Detectors/pnpm/Pnpm6Detector.cs	66.6%	1 Missing and 2 partials ⚠️
...pm/ParsingUtilities/PnpmParsingUtilitiesFactory.cs	86.6%	1 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
.../pnpm/ParsingUtilities/PnpmParsingUtilitiesBase.cs	95.0%	0 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
...ComponentDetection.Detectors/pnpm/Pnpm5Detector.cs	90.9%	0 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
...ComponentDetection.Detectors/pnpm/Pnpm9Detector.cs	97.8%	0 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@          Coverage Diff           @@
##            main   #1283    +/-   ##
======================================
  Coverage   89.1%   89.1%            
======================================
  Files        361     369     +8     
  Lines      27742   27996   +254     
  Branches    1757    1780    +23     
======================================
+ Hits       24719   24972   +253     
- Misses      2643    2644     +1     
  Partials     380     380            

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[github-actions]

👋 Hi! It looks like you modified some files in the Detectors folder.
You may need to bump the detector versions if any of the following scenarios apply:

• The detector detects more or fewer components than before
• The detector generates different parent/child graph relationships than before
• The detector generates different devDependencies values than before

If none of the above scenarios apply, feel free to ignore this comment 🙂