-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 160
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Query content model blocks. #2851
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
…u/juliaroldi/images-word-tables
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
In general, it is a perfect idea to have a common query function.
Once done, this function will be used widely, so we need to be careful on how it is designed and worked. We need to make sure if it is misused, it can fail the build.
/** | ||
* Options for queryContentModel | ||
*/ | ||
export interface QueryContentModelOptions<T> { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
add type constraint here for T.
/** | ||
* Optional selector to filter the blocks/segments | ||
*/ | ||
selector?: (element: T) => boolean; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
How about name it "filter"?
elements.push(...(blockGroupsResults as T[])); | ||
break; | ||
case 'Table': | ||
if (type == block.blockType && (!selector || selector(block as T))) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
what if T is a segment type, are we converting block to segment?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actually we should make sure only the correct type of object can trigger selector()
const blocks: T[] = []; | ||
for (const row of table.rows) { | ||
for (const cell of row.cells) { | ||
const items = queryContentModel<T>(cell, options); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Better create a internalQueryContentModel
which does not need to check value of options then let both here and queryContentModel
call it
packages/roosterjs-content-model-api/lib/modelApi/common/queryContentModel.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
packages/roosterjs-content-model-api/lib/modelApi/common/queryContentModel.ts
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
return elements; | ||
} | ||
|
||
function queryContentModelBlocksInternal<T extends ReadonlyContentModelBlock>( |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
since you don't need the parameter options
now, you can merge these two functions together, so no need to duplicate the for loop for block group
blockType?: ContentModelBlockType, | ||
filter?: (element: T) => element is T, | ||
findFirstOnly?: boolean | ||
): T[] { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Do you also want to return the path?
block: ReadonlyContentModelBlock, | ||
type: string | ||
): block is T { | ||
return block.blockType == type; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
No need to have this function. Just directly check blockType == type should work
elements.push(block); | ||
} | ||
|
||
if (block.blockType == 'BlockGroup') { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Use switch...case instead of multiple if
} | ||
|
||
if (block.blockType == 'BlockGroup') { | ||
for (const childBlock of block.blocks) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
What if you are querying block group? Then you should return directly here
const table = block; | ||
for (const row of table.rows) { | ||
for (const cell of row.cells) { | ||
for (const cellBlock of cell.blocks) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
cell is BlockGroup, so you can reuse the code for blockGroup here
*/ | ||
export function queryContentModelBlocks<T extends ReadonlyContentModelBlock>( | ||
group: ReadonlyContentModelBlockGroup, | ||
blockType?: ContentModelBlockType, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This blockType needs to be coupled with T. Otherwise, you can pass two different types, for example:
queryContentModelBlock<ContentModelParagraph>(group, 'Table');
In theory you should make this fail the build.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
You can declare like this.
export function queryContentModelBlocks<T extends ReadonlyContentModelBlock>(
group: ReadonlyContentModelBlockGroup,
blockType: T extends ReadonlyContentModelBlockBase<infer U> ? U : never,
...) {
...
}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Then blockType and T must match, otherwise build will fail.
This changed introduced a new API,
queryContentModel
, to theroosterjs-content-model-api
. Its role is to retrieve either blocks of a similar type, or a particular block specified by a selector. This enhancement builds upon thefindEditingImage
function, enabling its logic to be applied in additional features like the OWA Accessibility Checker. Moreover, it addresses the issue of how images inserted into tables from Word Online are handled, asqueryContentModel
also checksformatContainer
blocks during image searches.Test case: